البحث:

Whereas two members of the majority, considering that:

the situation in 1956 and 1960 of the public dental service and school
dental care in northern Norway was regarded by the Norwegian...

he Respondent Government, during the oral hearing, submitted as a
subsidiary argument and without prejudice to its main conclusion, that
no violation of Article 4, paragraph (2), had occurred. It...

As in the present case, students studying abroad without the
authorization of the Norwegian authorities were required to sign the
declaration form before being admitted to the supplementary courses...

The Applicant's Counsel, in his observations of 1st March 1963, agreed
that the time-limit expired on 16th June 1962. The Application was
dated 8th June 1962, however, and was acknowledged by...

X. v. AUSTRIA - 1452/62 [1963] ECHR 4 (18 December 1963)
THE FACTSWhereas the facts presented by the parties may be summarised asfollows:The Applicant is a Norwegian dentist, born in 1934 and...