State of Florida, Petitioner, vs. Yolinda Wright

[align=left]
Supreme Court of Florida





____________




No. SC06-2326


____________





STATE OF FLORIDA,


Petitioner,



vs.




YOLINDA WRIGHT ZINNERMAN,


Respondent.



[January 15, 2009]



LEWIS, J.


We have for review Zinnerman v. State, 942 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.


We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition of Martinez v. State, 981 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2008). When our decision in Martinez became final, we issued an order directing respondent to show cause why we should not exercise jurisdiction, quash the Zinnerman decision, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Martinez. Upon consideration of the responses to our Order to Show Cause, we have determined to exercise jurisdiction.




- 1 -




We accordingly grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Fifth District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court's decision in Martinez.


It is so ordered.


QUINCE, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., and ANSTEAD, Senior Justice, concur.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF FILED, DETERMINED.


Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Great Public Importance




Fifth District - Case No. 5D05-1172


(Osceola County)


Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Petitioner

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent
[/align]